Home ombud advised to lay charges | News | National


The troubled Group Scheme Ombud Service (CSOS) has been requested to put fraud and tried theft fees in opposition to a service supplier who deposited the company’s R20-million surplus funds into an Absa account beneath his personal firm’s title.

That is in line with a forensic report into the CSOS, which additionally really helpful that the company ought to get well R80-million that was “recklessly” paid into now defunct VBS Mutual Financial institution by the identical service supplier, Gundos Pty, owned by Ralliom Razwinane.

In response to the report, Gundos Pty was not an authorised monetary providers supplier, as required by regulation.

READ MORE: R80m VBS loss for properties ombud

Razwinane was one of many people who acquired gratuitous funds “with none simply or authorized trigger” from VBS. In response to the South African Reserve Financial institution’s report, compiled by Terry Motau SC, Razwinane acquired R24 224 198.

The forensic report by Knowles Husain Lindsay Attorneys, which was introduced to the previous CSOS board final month, stated the funds weren’t authorised by the board.

The board was made conscious that the Absa cost was achieved by a 3rd celebration in August final 12 months after a subcommittee investigated Absa’s insistence that it didn’t have an account within the CSOS’s title.

In response to the report, the R20-million deposit of the company’s surplus funds, which was made in January final 12 months, meant that the state establishment had no direct entry to the funds.

The report stated: “CSOS doesn’t have a contractual proper to obtain the money invested in Absa Financial institution on account of the truth that the funding account just isn’t within the title of CSOS and the cash is due to this fact not a monetary asset of CSOS … The prudent authority’s investigator [advocate Motau] does have the powers [as we understand it] to entry these data and to find out whether or not any prison or different unlawful actions accompanied the opening of the Absa funding.”

The client was mirrored by Absa as Gundo Pty and Gundo’s reference was mirrored as Razwinane.

“Adv Motau’s group might thus very nicely have an curiosity in investigating how the Absa funding ended up in an Absa account held by Gundo Pty,” in line with the report.

The CSOS was set as much as resolve administrative disputes in schemes resembling sectional title and owners’ associations.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here